|
Pick of the Month
|
Sharia TipSheet
Women Under Shariah
by Clare M. Lopez
November 2022
Afghan supreme leader orders full implementation of sharia (Islamic Law), which includes public executions for adultery, apostasy and homosexuality, stoning, flogging (including for female victims of rape), and the amputation of limbs
Afghan police broke up a news conference on 3 November 2022 in Kabul, Afghanistan that was called to launch a new women’s movement called “Afghan Women’s Movement for Equality” and arrested a female activist, Zarifa Yaqobi, and four male colleagues
Taliban official whips young women students outside Badakhshan University in northeastern Afghanistan because their hijabs were deemed insufficient covering under Islamic Law—Taliban demand full burka or at minimum a niqab to cover female faces
Five young men “with non-Western asylum-related immigrant backgrounds” (four Syrians, one ‘stateless’) were arrested by Swedish police in Malmo on 22 October 2022 in the very act of raping a woman. Unfortunately, the Qur’an teaches that infidel women may be taken lawfully for sexual use (see Q 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30), especially if their clothing does not cover them head-to-toe (see Q 33:59)
Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape in the world, with high percentage of offenders being of Muslim immigrant background
Completely legal under shariah: a 14-year-old Hindu girl was kidnapped in Pakistan, likely raped, allegedly converted to Islam, and then forcibly married to her abductor
Under shariah, women are property of their husbands: an Iranian Muslim husband beheaded his 17-year-old wife and paraded her severed head in the streets
‘Hijab distinguishes Muslim women from others so molesters [rapists] can spare them’
In early November 2022, the beheaded bodies of two young Egyptian girls aged 11 and 13 were found in a sewage system in a Syrian camp housing Islamic State families: if these children were accused of some shariah infraction, it would have been completely legal under Islamic Law to kill them
Female fans at FIFA World Cup 2022 soccer games in Qatar run the risk of arrest and imprisonment if their clothing is not deemed sufficiently Islamic
by Clare M. Lopez
November 2022
Afghan supreme leader orders full implementation of sharia (Islamic Law), which includes public executions for adultery, apostasy and homosexuality, stoning, flogging (including for female victims of rape), and the amputation of limbs
Afghan police broke up a news conference on 3 November 2022 in Kabul, Afghanistan that was called to launch a new women’s movement called “Afghan Women’s Movement for Equality” and arrested a female activist, Zarifa Yaqobi, and four male colleagues
Taliban official whips young women students outside Badakhshan University in northeastern Afghanistan because their hijabs were deemed insufficient covering under Islamic Law—Taliban demand full burka or at minimum a niqab to cover female faces
Five young men “with non-Western asylum-related immigrant backgrounds” (four Syrians, one ‘stateless’) were arrested by Swedish police in Malmo on 22 October 2022 in the very act of raping a woman. Unfortunately, the Qur’an teaches that infidel women may be taken lawfully for sexual use (see Q 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30), especially if their clothing does not cover them head-to-toe (see Q 33:59)
Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape in the world, with high percentage of offenders being of Muslim immigrant background
Completely legal under shariah: a 14-year-old Hindu girl was kidnapped in Pakistan, likely raped, allegedly converted to Islam, and then forcibly married to her abductor
Under shariah, women are property of their husbands: an Iranian Muslim husband beheaded his 17-year-old wife and paraded her severed head in the streets
‘Hijab distinguishes Muslim women from others so molesters [rapists] can spare them’
In early November 2022, the beheaded bodies of two young Egyptian girls aged 11 and 13 were found in a sewage system in a Syrian camp housing Islamic State families: if these children were accused of some shariah infraction, it would have been completely legal under Islamic Law to kill them
Female fans at FIFA World Cup 2022 soccer games in Qatar run the risk of arrest and imprisonment if their clothing is not deemed sufficiently Islamic
January 31, 2022
PERMALINK
Reposted at Gates of Vienna
Is the Second Muslim Federal Judicial Nominee a Sharia Supremacist?
The first Muslim federal judicial nominee, Zahid Quraishi, skated to a federal judgeship last year without any serious inquiry into his personal beliefs regarding sharia supremacy, jihad, or the obvious conflicts between sharia law and the U.S. Constitution. He was asked, perfunctorily, what he knows about sharia law, and he claimed not to know anything about it. His answer, which was not believable, was allowed to stand, untouched.
This set a very bad precedent that, if left unchallenged, will allow all future Muslim nominees for federal judgeships to evade critical questioning and ascend to the bench even if they believe in sharia supremacy with violent jihad as the means to achieve it in accordance with the dictates of standard Islamic doctrine.
Any observant Muslim nominee will hold these beliefs because these beliefs come straight from the Quran, hadiths, and Islamic scholarly consensus. There are many passages in the Quran calling for violent jihad. Here are just three:
Moreover, several passages in standard Islamic doctrine call for sharia supremacy, that is, world domination and the forced conversion of all humanity to Islam. Here are just three:
We must summon the political will to reverse the precedent set in the Quraishi nomination and engage subsequent Muslim nominees on their personal beliefs. Their personal beliefs are consequential because sharia poses an existential threat to the United States and conflicts with the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land, in numerous ways.
The time to reverse that precedent is now. A second Muslim has been nominated for a federal judgeship. Nusrat Jahan Choudhury is the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois. If confirmed, Choudhury would become a federal judge for the Eastern District of New York.
Because standard Islamic doctrine - the direct unchangeable word of Allah in the Muslim belief system - espouses sharia supremacy and violent jihad as the means to achieve it, and because sharia law conflicts with the U.S. Constitution in fundamental ways, Choudhury should be asked the questions set forth below at her confirmation hearing.
Because lawmakers fell down on the job the first time, we really have no idea whether or not the first Muslim federal judge is a sharia supremacist. Is the second Muslim federal judicial nominee a sharia supremacist? This time, and every time, our elected representatives owe us an answer. This time, and every time, the ‘I don’t know anything about sharia law’ dodge from nominees who freely say they are Muslim just won’t cut it.
These questions will be communicated to lawmakers and to the nominee. If she responds directly, the Sharia TipSheet will print her answers verbatim.
Questions for the Nominee
It has been reported you are a Muslim. While there is no religious test for federal office, the Senate and the American people are entitled to know whether your religious beliefs are compatible or incompatible with U.S. law - law which, if you are confirmed, you will be asked to swear to uphold. As a preliminary question, do you as a Muslim affirm and adhere to Islamic doctrine from the Quran, hadith, and other authoritative Islamic sources?
Islamic doctrine holds that sharia law should be the supreme law of the land throughout the entire world. It further holds that sharia law is divine in origin and thus superior to any human-made law, including the U.S. Constitution. If confirmed, you will be asked to swear an oath you will uphold the U.S. Constitution, which by virtue of its Article VI, is the supreme law of the land. Do you renounce the portions of Islamic doctrine calling for the supremacy of sharia law and the subjugation of all human-made law to sharia law?
Islamic doctrine holds that jihad is the means by which the supremacy of sharia law is to be achieved. Do you renounce the portions of Islamic doctrine calling for jihad to achieve sharia supremacy?
What role, if any, should sharia law play in federal cases? In family law?
Will you go on record now and state that our 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech gives the right to anyone in the United States to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and will you also go on record now and state that you support and defend anyone’s right to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and that you condemn anyone who threatens death or physical harm to another person who is exercising that right?
Our 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion in the United States. As part of that freedom, anyone in the United States has the right to join or leave any religion, or have no religion at all. Will you go on record now and state that you support and defend the idea that in the United States a Muslim has not only the freedom to leave Islam, but to do so without fear of physical harm, and will you also go on record now and state that you condemn anyone who threatens physical harm to a Muslim who is exercising that freedom?
According to the words of Allah found in Quran 5:38 and the teachings of your prophet Muhammad, amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft. But our U.S. Constitution, which consists of man-made laws, has the 8th Amendment that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment such as this. Do you agree with Allah and your prophet Muhammad that amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft in the United States, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting such punishments are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah and teaching of Muhammad?
According to the words of Allah found in Quran 4:3, Muslim men are allowed, but not required, to be married to up to four wives. Being married to more than one wife in the United States is illegal according to our man-made bigamy laws. Do you agree with Allah that it is legal for a Muslim man in the United States to be married to more than one woman, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting bigamy are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah?
Do you affirm or renounce the following from Islamic sources and scholars:
If confirmed, would you enforce U.S. antiterrorism laws against your fellow Muslims accused of violating those laws (e.g., providing material support for terrorism - 18 U.S. Code § 2339B)?
Are you a member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA)?
Do you agree with AMJA that
SEEN AND AGREED:
Steve Amundson
David Baldovin
Richard Blake
David Bores
Janis Chester, M.D.
John C. CLARKE
Maureen Cooney
Anni Cyrus
Graeme George
Carl Goldberg
Robert Heffley
Jim Horn
Dan Hromada
Debbie Jones
Steve Kirby
Sharon Kowalski
Paula Moore - San Antonio, TX
Michael Peppe
Gary R. Porter
Don M Powers, Esq.
Mike Ramirez - San Antonio, TX
Donald Reiter
Roger Russin
Jim Simpson
David S. Whitley
Mary Wierbicki
Yvonne Wolf
Chris Wright - Sharia TipSheet - Liberato.US
PERMALINK
Reposted at Gates of Vienna
Is the Second Muslim Federal Judicial Nominee a Sharia Supremacist?
The first Muslim federal judicial nominee, Zahid Quraishi, skated to a federal judgeship last year without any serious inquiry into his personal beliefs regarding sharia supremacy, jihad, or the obvious conflicts between sharia law and the U.S. Constitution. He was asked, perfunctorily, what he knows about sharia law, and he claimed not to know anything about it. His answer, which was not believable, was allowed to stand, untouched.
This set a very bad precedent that, if left unchallenged, will allow all future Muslim nominees for federal judgeships to evade critical questioning and ascend to the bench even if they believe in sharia supremacy with violent jihad as the means to achieve it in accordance with the dictates of standard Islamic doctrine.
Any observant Muslim nominee will hold these beliefs because these beliefs come straight from the Quran, hadiths, and Islamic scholarly consensus. There are many passages in the Quran calling for violent jihad. Here are just three:
- Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God’s religion shall reign supreme. Quran 8:39
- I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads; strike off the very tips of their fingers. Quran 8:12
- If you encounter the disbelievers in a battle, strike-off their heads. Take them as captives when they are defeated. Quran 47:4
Moreover, several passages in standard Islamic doctrine call for sharia supremacy, that is, world domination and the forced conversion of all humanity to Islam. Here are just three:
- Muhammad said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me (that) I am the Messenger and in all that I have brought.” Muslim: C9B1N31 (hadith)
- The only religion acceptable before God is Islam. Quran 3:19
- He it is who has sent his Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to make it victorious over all religion even though the infidels may resist. Quran 61:9
We must summon the political will to reverse the precedent set in the Quraishi nomination and engage subsequent Muslim nominees on their personal beliefs. Their personal beliefs are consequential because sharia poses an existential threat to the United States and conflicts with the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land, in numerous ways.
The time to reverse that precedent is now. A second Muslim has been nominated for a federal judgeship. Nusrat Jahan Choudhury is the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois. If confirmed, Choudhury would become a federal judge for the Eastern District of New York.
Because standard Islamic doctrine - the direct unchangeable word of Allah in the Muslim belief system - espouses sharia supremacy and violent jihad as the means to achieve it, and because sharia law conflicts with the U.S. Constitution in fundamental ways, Choudhury should be asked the questions set forth below at her confirmation hearing.
Because lawmakers fell down on the job the first time, we really have no idea whether or not the first Muslim federal judge is a sharia supremacist. Is the second Muslim federal judicial nominee a sharia supremacist? This time, and every time, our elected representatives owe us an answer. This time, and every time, the ‘I don’t know anything about sharia law’ dodge from nominees who freely say they are Muslim just won’t cut it.
These questions will be communicated to lawmakers and to the nominee. If she responds directly, the Sharia TipSheet will print her answers verbatim.
Questions for the Nominee
It has been reported you are a Muslim. While there is no religious test for federal office, the Senate and the American people are entitled to know whether your religious beliefs are compatible or incompatible with U.S. law - law which, if you are confirmed, you will be asked to swear to uphold. As a preliminary question, do you as a Muslim affirm and adhere to Islamic doctrine from the Quran, hadith, and other authoritative Islamic sources?
Islamic doctrine holds that sharia law should be the supreme law of the land throughout the entire world. It further holds that sharia law is divine in origin and thus superior to any human-made law, including the U.S. Constitution. If confirmed, you will be asked to swear an oath you will uphold the U.S. Constitution, which by virtue of its Article VI, is the supreme law of the land. Do you renounce the portions of Islamic doctrine calling for the supremacy of sharia law and the subjugation of all human-made law to sharia law?
Islamic doctrine holds that jihad is the means by which the supremacy of sharia law is to be achieved. Do you renounce the portions of Islamic doctrine calling for jihad to achieve sharia supremacy?
What role, if any, should sharia law play in federal cases? In family law?
Will you go on record now and state that our 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech gives the right to anyone in the United States to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and will you also go on record now and state that you support and defend anyone’s right to criticize or disagree with your prophet Muhammad, and that you condemn anyone who threatens death or physical harm to another person who is exercising that right?
Our 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of religion in the United States. As part of that freedom, anyone in the United States has the right to join or leave any religion, or have no religion at all. Will you go on record now and state that you support and defend the idea that in the United States a Muslim has not only the freedom to leave Islam, but to do so without fear of physical harm, and will you also go on record now and state that you condemn anyone who threatens physical harm to a Muslim who is exercising that freedom?
According to the words of Allah found in Quran 5:38 and the teachings of your prophet Muhammad, amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft. But our U.S. Constitution, which consists of man-made laws, has the 8th Amendment that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment such as this. Do you agree with Allah and your prophet Muhammad that amputation of a hand is an acceptable punishment for theft in the United States, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting such punishments are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah and teaching of Muhammad?
According to the words of Allah found in Quran 4:3, Muslim men are allowed, but not required, to be married to up to four wives. Being married to more than one wife in the United States is illegal according to our man-made bigamy laws. Do you agree with Allah that it is legal for a Muslim man in the United States to be married to more than one woman, or do you believe that our man-made laws prohibiting bigamy are true laws and are to be followed instead of this 7th Century command of Allah?
Do you affirm or renounce the following from Islamic sources and scholars:
- “the worst of all the moving creatures, in the sight of Allah, are those who reject Faith and do not believe” (Quran 8:55)?
- the approval of wife-beating (Quran 4:34)?
- the approval of child marriage (Quran 65:4)
- the testimony of a woman is worth half that of a man’s in court (various sources collected here)?
- the nonrecognition of marital rape?
If confirmed, would you enforce U.S. antiterrorism laws against your fellow Muslims accused of violating those laws (e.g., providing material support for terrorism - 18 U.S. Code § 2339B)?
Are you a member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA)?
Do you agree with AMJA that
- Muslims should not work in American law enforcement?
- Muslims should not be “pleased with a legal system that does not come from Allah”?
- Muslims should seek justice in Islamic courts, not secular courts?
SEEN AND AGREED:
Steve Amundson
David Baldovin
Richard Blake
David Bores
Janis Chester, M.D.
John C. CLARKE
Maureen Cooney
Anni Cyrus
Graeme George
Carl Goldberg
Robert Heffley
Jim Horn
Dan Hromada
Debbie Jones
Steve Kirby
Sharon Kowalski
Paula Moore - San Antonio, TX
Michael Peppe
Gary R. Porter
Don M Powers, Esq.
Mike Ramirez - San Antonio, TX
Donald Reiter
Roger Russin
Jim Simpson
David S. Whitley
Mary Wierbicki
Yvonne Wolf
Chris Wright - Sharia TipSheet - Liberato.US
August 20, 2021
Islamic Doctrine Is a Threat to National Security and Law Enforcement
(FOIA Case Update)
11/12/21 - The FBI asked for more time and promised to produce more documents.
A new briefing schedule runs out to July 2022.
The document nearby contains the response to the FBI's motion for summary judgment
in a Freedom of Information Act case attempting to determine the FBI's position
on whether Islamic doctrine is a threat to national security and law enforcement.
(FOIA Case Update)
11/12/21 - The FBI asked for more time and promised to produce more documents.
A new briefing schedule runs out to July 2022.
The document nearby contains the response to the FBI's motion for summary judgment
in a Freedom of Information Act case attempting to determine the FBI's position
on whether Islamic doctrine is a threat to national security and law enforcement.
This case is about whether or not the nation’s premier law enforcement agency has ever thought about Islamic doctrine in and of itself being a threat and, if so, has come to any conclusions regarding the matter. Given the passages in standard Islamic doctrine exhorting sharia supremacy and violent jihad as the means to achieve it (set forth below) and the jihadist attacks inspired by standard Islamic doctrine on U.S. soil (also listed below), the question presented is of the utmost importance to national security and law enforcement and, thus, is of paramount interest to the body politic. The American people are entitled to know whether their chief law enforcement agency considers Islamic doctrine a threat, especially now that the Taliban control Afghanistan again....
Continued in the document: Court filing with exhibits:
(With Links) (No Links)
Continued in the document: Court filing with exhibits:
(With Links) (No Links)
|
| ||||
Reposted at The United West here
Conservative Casual Friday (blogtalk radio show)
Jihad and the G-Men (FOIA case update)
Show Link
Conservative Casual Friday (blogtalk radio show)
Jihad and the G-Men (FOIA case update)
Show Link
How Islam and the Left Join Forces to Destroy America
October 29, 2020
3-part video series by David Bores (former police chief - bio here)
October 29, 2020
3-part video series by David Bores (former police chief - bio here)
- Part 1: The Birth of the Red/Green Axis and the Marxist and Islamic Doctrine That Propels It
- Part 2: BLM and Antifa Foot Soldiers of the Red/Green Axis and Corporate America Financial Support
- Part III: Consequences of Red/Green Axis, Purge of Islamic Threat Training, and Active Jihadists
|
|
|
|
The Muslim Oath Project
by Stephen M. Kirby
by Stephen M. Kirby
- Do Muslim politicians support the U.S. Constitution?
- Find out here
Sharia TipSheet
"Islam Will Be Victorious" - bumper sticker seen in the U.S.
How many true religions do you know that talk like that?
The answer is none. But, then again, Islam is not a religion. It seeks world domination. It claims to be a superior way of life, not just religiously and spiritually, but politically, socially, and economically. It also seeks to impose an all-encompassing legal system (sharia) to control every aspect of human existence here on earth. Islam is a totalitarian world-government-in-waiting with just enough religious veneer to confuse people. Because it strays far beyond the religious and spiritual realms into the political, legal, social, and economic arenas, Islam has forfeited any special standing or regard ordinarily given to true religions (tax-exempt status, freedom of religion under the First Amendment, our goodwill, etc.).
The Islamists have a comprehensive, carefully thought-out plan to achieve world domination and they are working the plan in every corner of the globe, including the United States. The rest of the world must unite and refuse to let Muslims take over the entire planet as they have actively been seeking from the very beginning of Islam. Militant Islam, Islamist radicals, and the imposition of sharia law in America must be opposed at every turn. The Sharia TipSheet endeavors to arm critics of radical Islam with the truth and raise public awareness that Islam and sharia law are not benign ideologies but are, instead, cancerous at their core and will eventually prove fatal to Western liberal democracy and the American way of life if left unchecked.
For documentation of the TipSheet's worldview, good starting points include -
* * * * * * * * * *
The Sharia TipSheet is independently produced.
Not affiliated with any group.
"Islam Will Be Victorious" - bumper sticker seen in the U.S.
How many true religions do you know that talk like that?
The answer is none. But, then again, Islam is not a religion. It seeks world domination. It claims to be a superior way of life, not just religiously and spiritually, but politically, socially, and economically. It also seeks to impose an all-encompassing legal system (sharia) to control every aspect of human existence here on earth. Islam is a totalitarian world-government-in-waiting with just enough religious veneer to confuse people. Because it strays far beyond the religious and spiritual realms into the political, legal, social, and economic arenas, Islam has forfeited any special standing or regard ordinarily given to true religions (tax-exempt status, freedom of religion under the First Amendment, our goodwill, etc.).
The Islamists have a comprehensive, carefully thought-out plan to achieve world domination and they are working the plan in every corner of the globe, including the United States. The rest of the world must unite and refuse to let Muslims take over the entire planet as they have actively been seeking from the very beginning of Islam. Militant Islam, Islamist radicals, and the imposition of sharia law in America must be opposed at every turn. The Sharia TipSheet endeavors to arm critics of radical Islam with the truth and raise public awareness that Islam and sharia law are not benign ideologies but are, instead, cancerous at their core and will eventually prove fatal to Western liberal democracy and the American way of life if left unchecked.
For documentation of the TipSheet's worldview, good starting points include -
- Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad by Stephen Coughlin
- The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America by Andrew McCarthy
- Shariah The Threat to America from the Center for Security Policy (the 'Team B Report' - Frank Gaffney, co-author)
- A JOURNALIST’S GUIDE TO VETTING MUSLIM LEADERS AND MOSQUES (see below)
"Wow, this is really great" - S.
(also useful for law enforcement officers) - Primer on fighting mosque construction applications:
“MOSQUES IN AMERICA: A Guide to Accountable Permit Hearings and Continuing Citizen Oversight” by Karen Lugo, Esq. - Interfaith Dialogue: Ask the Imam - 'Interfaith dialogue' is a weapon of war. This two-page brief prepares you to counter-attack. Sample Question -- Why is the testimony of a woman only worth half that of a man in an Islamic court? (see below)
- Essentials of Sharia from “Reliance of the Traveller” - "fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah", "non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules", and other gems from the 'religion of peace'. (see below)
- Sharia Law for the Non-Muslim (see below)
- Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America by Ann Corcoran (see below)
- Backyard Jihad: How Parents Can Detect the Invisible Threat of Radicalization by Valerie Greenfield
review by noted writer Andrew Harrod here
* * * * * * * * * *
The Sharia TipSheet is independently produced.
Not affiliated with any group.
| vetting_muslims_and_mosques.docx |
| sharialaw_for_the_nonmuslim.pdf |
| refugee_resettlement_hijra.pdf |
A Sharia TipSheet Original