‘Refugee Resettlement’ a Cover for Muslim Colonization of the U.S.? Nobody’s Talking
Originially Published in the Sharia TipSheet
October 2016
An official of the U.S. government and a representative of government-funded Catholic Charities gave a presentation on refugee resettlement on October 17th at St. Ann’s Roman Catholic Church in Arlington, Virginia. Following the presentation, the Sharia TipSheet handed a set of questions to the speakers shining a light on, among other things, how the resettlement of Syrian refugees facilitates Muslim colonization of America. Both speakers accepted the questions, but failed to provide any answers. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE.
The first presenter was Anastasia Brown, Director of the Division of Refugee Services in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). She is also former Director of Refugee Resettlement for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), a big government contractor which rakes in tens of millions of taxpayer dollars every year for refugee services. The Migration and Refugee Services arm of USCCB is 97 percent government-funded.
There is a revolving door between ORR and government refugee contractors. Former ORR Director Lavinia Limon is executive director of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants [USCRI]. Another former ORR director, Eskinder Negash, left ORR to return to USCRI as a vice-president.
The second presenter was Patricia S. Maloof, Program Director of Migration and Refugee Services of Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Arlington. In 2003, Maloof presented a whitewashed view of hijra and dhimmitude – Islamic precepts of colonization and subjugation of non-Muslims – in her book, Muslim Refugees in the United States: A Guide for Service Providers.
The TipSheet’s questions follow. More reporting on the event here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FBI officials (here and here), the Director of National Intelligence, and Hillary Clinton have all said that adequate vetting of Syrian refugees is impossible. In light of this fact, how can you justify allowing more Syrian refugees into the country? NO RESPONSE [Note – The Sharia TipSheet tangled with a member of St. Ann’s refugee committee after the presentation who kept insisting that the vetting steps described in the presentation are adequate. He tried to dodge Hillary Clinton’s admission that adequate vetting is impossible, but gave up when the TipSheet pressed the point.]
How can you justify the fact that only a handful of Syrian refugees are Christians while the overwhelming majority is Muslim? What facts can you recite to disprove that the Syrian refugee program facilitates the Muslim colonization of America? NO RESPONSE
What sense does it make to import more people (Muslims) who hate Americans and want to kill us? NO RESPONSE [Note – Refugees admitted to the U.S. have a pathway to citizenship after five years.]
How can the practice of calling refugees who go on long-term government welfare programs “self-sufficient” be justified? NO RESPONSE [Note – It is claimed that 82 percent of refugees get to “self-sufficiency” in 180 days, but this is misleading because the contractors simply hand many off to long-term welfare programs and call them ‘self-sufficient’.]
What percentage of Syrian refugees want the U.S. to adopt sharia law? What percentage subscribe to taquiya, hijra, and dawa (the Islamic religious duties to lie, colonize, and prepare the ground for jihad)? NO RESPONSE
The U.S said it would take 85,000 refugees this year. What is the total expected number after chain migration? NO RESPONSE [Note - The big contractors that stand to gain monetarily from more refugee resettlement want to more than double the current number of refugees admitted to the U.S. from all countries to 200,000 next year.]
Maloof: When discussing refugee matters, do you inform Catholic clergy and parishioners that Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Arlington is 29 percent government-funded and, if so, what specific steps do you take to do so? If not, why not? NO RESPONSE
Maloof: When discussing refugee matters, do you inform Catholic clergy and parishioners of taquiya, hijra, and dawa (the Islamic religious duties to lie, colonize, and prepare the ground for jihad) and, if so, how? If not, why not? NO RESPONSE
Originially Published in the Sharia TipSheet
October 2016
An official of the U.S. government and a representative of government-funded Catholic Charities gave a presentation on refugee resettlement on October 17th at St. Ann’s Roman Catholic Church in Arlington, Virginia. Following the presentation, the Sharia TipSheet handed a set of questions to the speakers shining a light on, among other things, how the resettlement of Syrian refugees facilitates Muslim colonization of America. Both speakers accepted the questions, but failed to provide any answers. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE.
The first presenter was Anastasia Brown, Director of the Division of Refugee Services in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). She is also former Director of Refugee Resettlement for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), a big government contractor which rakes in tens of millions of taxpayer dollars every year for refugee services. The Migration and Refugee Services arm of USCCB is 97 percent government-funded.
There is a revolving door between ORR and government refugee contractors. Former ORR Director Lavinia Limon is executive director of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants [USCRI]. Another former ORR director, Eskinder Negash, left ORR to return to USCRI as a vice-president.
The second presenter was Patricia S. Maloof, Program Director of Migration and Refugee Services of Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Arlington. In 2003, Maloof presented a whitewashed view of hijra and dhimmitude – Islamic precepts of colonization and subjugation of non-Muslims – in her book, Muslim Refugees in the United States: A Guide for Service Providers.
The TipSheet’s questions follow. More reporting on the event here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FBI officials (here and here), the Director of National Intelligence, and Hillary Clinton have all said that adequate vetting of Syrian refugees is impossible. In light of this fact, how can you justify allowing more Syrian refugees into the country? NO RESPONSE [Note – The Sharia TipSheet tangled with a member of St. Ann’s refugee committee after the presentation who kept insisting that the vetting steps described in the presentation are adequate. He tried to dodge Hillary Clinton’s admission that adequate vetting is impossible, but gave up when the TipSheet pressed the point.]
How can you justify the fact that only a handful of Syrian refugees are Christians while the overwhelming majority is Muslim? What facts can you recite to disprove that the Syrian refugee program facilitates the Muslim colonization of America? NO RESPONSE
What sense does it make to import more people (Muslims) who hate Americans and want to kill us? NO RESPONSE [Note – Refugees admitted to the U.S. have a pathway to citizenship after five years.]
How can the practice of calling refugees who go on long-term government welfare programs “self-sufficient” be justified? NO RESPONSE [Note – It is claimed that 82 percent of refugees get to “self-sufficiency” in 180 days, but this is misleading because the contractors simply hand many off to long-term welfare programs and call them ‘self-sufficient’.]
What percentage of Syrian refugees want the U.S. to adopt sharia law? What percentage subscribe to taquiya, hijra, and dawa (the Islamic religious duties to lie, colonize, and prepare the ground for jihad)? NO RESPONSE
The U.S said it would take 85,000 refugees this year. What is the total expected number after chain migration? NO RESPONSE [Note - The big contractors that stand to gain monetarily from more refugee resettlement want to more than double the current number of refugees admitted to the U.S. from all countries to 200,000 next year.]
Maloof: When discussing refugee matters, do you inform Catholic clergy and parishioners that Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Arlington is 29 percent government-funded and, if so, what specific steps do you take to do so? If not, why not? NO RESPONSE
Maloof: When discussing refugee matters, do you inform Catholic clergy and parishioners of taquiya, hijra, and dawa (the Islamic religious duties to lie, colonize, and prepare the ground for jihad) and, if so, how? If not, why not? NO RESPONSE