Dedicated to Keeping America a Free Country
Liberato.US
  • Home
  • U.S. Constitution
    • Constitution News
    • Constitution Minute
    • Guest Commentary
    • Pushback Network >
      • Free Speech Project
      • Archive
    • The Amendment
    • Showcase
    • Constitution Resources
  • Muslim Oath Project
    • Videos
    • Related News
    • Take Action
  • Rhetoric Central
    • The Daily Skirmish
    • Issue Hubs >
      • Election Fraud
    • Message of the Week
    • Fight Socialsm >
      • Memes and Zingers
    • Encounters
    • Conversion Stories
    • Narratives >
      • Single Payer
      • Sharia
      • The Left
      • Environment
      • Diversity
      • Inequality
      • Assisted Suicide
  • News
    • Single Payer News
    • Obamacare
    • Sharia in America
    • Assisted Suicide News
    • Noncitizen Voting
    • LeftWatch
  • Activism
  • Special Reports
  • Meme Gallery
  • Creative
  • CampusTown.US
  • Legacy Pages
    • The Truth
    • The Minority Messenger
    • Media Hall of Shame
    • The Discontenterati
    • Rule of Law Alerts
    • Confrontations
    • Obamacare
    • Voter Fraud
    • Tea Party Reporter
    • Obamacare Updates (2016-2017)
  • I'm Feeling Lucky
  • Contact
Picture
Obama-era Rule of Law Alerts

"thank you for all you do!
I love the Constitution Minutes,
but there's so much info I feel I need to re-read them."
- Tea Partier


Constitution Minute
January 10, 2021



H.R. 1 Is a Threat to Free Speech

The Democrats’ elections bill, H.R. 1, has been reintroduced [unofficial bill text here - section summaries here].  It’s similar to last year’s bill, a sprawling 791-page hydra-headed monster that touches on everything from voter rolls and redistricting commissions to campaign finance and beyond.  Tonight, I will barely scratch the surface on just one aspect of the bill, its threats to free speech.

According to the Institute for Free Speech, H.R. 1 “would institute sweeping new limitations on speech about campaigns and public affairs. This radical bill would, in fact, greatly harm the ability of the people to freely speak, publish, and organize into groups to advocate for better government.”
  • In particular, H.R. 1 would impose onerous and unworkable standards on the ability of Americans and groups of Americans to discuss the policy issues of the day with elected officials and speak to the public. Other sections of the bill would violate the privacy of advocacy groups and their supporters, stringently regulate political speech on the Internet, and compel speakers to include lengthy government-mandated messages identifying some of their supporters by name in their communications. H.R. 1 would also coerce Americans into funding the campaigns of candidates with which they may disagree in a system that research has proven hasn’t worked elsewhere. If signed into law, all of these provisions would be interpreted and enforced by a newly partisan Federal Election Commission.

The Chair of the Federal Election Commission would become a powerful ‘campaign speech czar’.  The FEC currently functions in a bipartisan manner, with six members - three Republicans and three Democrats.  The commissioners select the chair who serves for a one-year term.  Under H.R. 1, the FEC would become a partisan agency with five members and a chair appointed by the President.  Whereas things are now done by bipartisan agreement, the chair would have the power to prepare the budget, issue subpoenas, compel testimony, and appoint a powerful General Counsel and Staff Director, both of whom would have enforcement powers.  Enforcement priorities and the selection of campaigns and campaign finance entities to investigate would become partisan exercises.  Regardless of your political leanings, do you really want your worst political enemies to have that kind of power over you?

H.R. 1 would also replace the current rules against coordination between political candidates and super PACs. The new rules would apply year-round, not just to campaign season and, if taken literally, would prevent almost every group of citizens - not just super PACs - from communicating about politics and public issues through radio, TV, newspapers, or the Internet.   The only ones left who could participate freely in public debate would be the candidates and political parties themselves - plus anyone that a newly partisan FEC decides not to enforce the rules against. 

We are staring down the barrel of a Biden administration with the Democrats in control of the House, the Senate, and the White House.  It’s a good bet H.R. 1 will get farther this year than it did last year when it died in the Republican-controlled Senate.  I’ll have more to say about H.R. 1 on future webinars.

     America is a special place.
               Home of the Free, Sweet Land of Liberty
                                         We are the keepers of the flame. 
                                                          It's up to us to safeguard the Republic 
                
               Semper Libertas!

                                      -Liberato