|
"thank you for all you do! I love the Constitution Minutes, but there's so much info I feel I need to re-read them." - Tea Partier |
Constitution Minute
July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
Last week, a pro-Islamic pressure group joined Democrat lawmakers in calling for the State Department to appoint a Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Global Islamophobia. The lawmakers included congressional Representatives Ilhan Omar and Andre Carson who are both Muslim. The pressure group was CAIR - the Council on American-Islamic Relations. CAIR is Hamas in America and an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial. The State Department designated Hamas a terrorist organization in 1997. The envoy would “go on the offensive against the international and interconnected problem of anti-Muslim bigotry.”
Critics warn such an envoy would expand the Islam’s war on free speech. They worry the envoy would “crack down on honest discussion of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and oppression.”
The critics are right to worry. Here’s what the future of a special envoy could look like:
Just to our north, a Canadian Muslim group also demanded a special envoy to deal with Islamophobia. The group wants the government to investigate suspected Islamophobes inside Canada’s national security agencies, which sounds like a witch hunt to me. They also want to indoctrinate school children and make it easier to prosecute hate crimes.
A German government advisory board recommended criminalizing criticism of Islam and curbing freedom of the press in the process.
Last month, a Dutch court upheld the conviction of politician Geert Wilders for insulting Moroccans at a campaign rally in 2014. Wilders called the prosecution a restriction on free speech. The ruling casts doubt on whether people in the Netherlands have any right left to criticize Islam, jihad violence, mass Islamic immigration, or the Islamization of their country.
The Nigerian Senate passed a bill proposing 10 years in prison for using hate speech to ‘stir up religious hatred’. This bill could easily be used to criminalize any truthful discussion of standard Islamic doctrine such as jihad violence. The Quran commands Muslims to “strike terror in the hearts of the Unbelievers.” No one - especially the Washington establishment - wants to talk about that but, unfortunately for Islam, it is the unalterable word of Allah and cannot be changed. But for the Islamic doctrine of jihad, the nearly 40,000 Islamic terrorist attacks by Muslims since 9/11 would not have occurred. The mission of a special envoy would include stifling legitimate criticisms of Islamic doctrines such as the ones I am making now. Islam is waging a war on free expression and using ‘Islamophobia’ as cover for taking away your freedom to speak your mind and tell the truth.
One last point: The chill a special envoy would place on free speech would not be limited to the United States. The proposal would put the power of the U.S. government behind efforts to bully other countries, not just about what speech they allow, but into changing their policies. The U.S. could withhold foreign aid or even impose sanctions unless other countries stop resisting mass Islamic immigration and allow Islamization to obliterate their national identities. Tell me why this is a good idea, again?
Islam is the only doctrine that demands special treatment like this. Tell me why we are all just supposed to shut up and bow down to Islam. I want our elected representatives and the Washington establishment to explain it to me.
Critics warn such an envoy would expand the Islam’s war on free speech. They worry the envoy would “crack down on honest discussion of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and oppression.”
The critics are right to worry. Here’s what the future of a special envoy could look like:
Just to our north, a Canadian Muslim group also demanded a special envoy to deal with Islamophobia. The group wants the government to investigate suspected Islamophobes inside Canada’s national security agencies, which sounds like a witch hunt to me. They also want to indoctrinate school children and make it easier to prosecute hate crimes.
A German government advisory board recommended criminalizing criticism of Islam and curbing freedom of the press in the process.
Last month, a Dutch court upheld the conviction of politician Geert Wilders for insulting Moroccans at a campaign rally in 2014. Wilders called the prosecution a restriction on free speech. The ruling casts doubt on whether people in the Netherlands have any right left to criticize Islam, jihad violence, mass Islamic immigration, or the Islamization of their country.
The Nigerian Senate passed a bill proposing 10 years in prison for using hate speech to ‘stir up religious hatred’. This bill could easily be used to criminalize any truthful discussion of standard Islamic doctrine such as jihad violence. The Quran commands Muslims to “strike terror in the hearts of the Unbelievers.” No one - especially the Washington establishment - wants to talk about that but, unfortunately for Islam, it is the unalterable word of Allah and cannot be changed. But for the Islamic doctrine of jihad, the nearly 40,000 Islamic terrorist attacks by Muslims since 9/11 would not have occurred. The mission of a special envoy would include stifling legitimate criticisms of Islamic doctrines such as the ones I am making now. Islam is waging a war on free expression and using ‘Islamophobia’ as cover for taking away your freedom to speak your mind and tell the truth.
One last point: The chill a special envoy would place on free speech would not be limited to the United States. The proposal would put the power of the U.S. government behind efforts to bully other countries, not just about what speech they allow, but into changing their policies. The U.S. could withhold foreign aid or even impose sanctions unless other countries stop resisting mass Islamic immigration and allow Islamization to obliterate their national identities. Tell me why this is a good idea, again?
Islam is the only doctrine that demands special treatment like this. Tell me why we are all just supposed to shut up and bow down to Islam. I want our elected representatives and the Washington establishment to explain it to me.